How many times we have not asked ourselves if Mexico itself as a country is rich and if so why? Or maybe it isn’t. In my point of view watching it as a critique of slightly contractionary, I mean to see the positive side of our country, could come to the conclusion that the country has too many factors or positive points in comparison to other countries maybe not with the same vegetation climate etc. as you see the need of Mexico is exploiting their properties to future becoming heritagesthat perhaps it would be watching the positivist side. But to change the face of the coin and open our eyes give us account that our country, like many others, keep us controlled by such see the currency or that would be material wealth by which all power tears and struggles to get his hands. Simply analyzing what are taxes, costs of operation, etc., in our country, will arrive at the conclusion that it is too much money lost and stolen. It would be impossible that campaigns do not triumph with such large budgets. This in my view does not have a solution, since so little is what is offered throughout society is fighting and tears for driving power over others.
Labor exploitation makes a type of worker who seeks survival and has small visions to short deadlines, with low salaries, and social discrimination. While the big boss, which maintains high levels of power (self-esteem), and has meetings expensive restaurants and leave impressive tips, traveling around the world to solve waste problems worry by their society and not the poor society which reaches call useless. Social and technical relations of production form an inseparable unit in manufacturing and large industry. Within the subordination of technical relations to the social relations of production to then define the set of these relations as relations of production. Consumption comes to hands of anyone that has currency or which has constantly worked to get it, and many times not It is valued as such. Ideological structure that has been incorporated into the reading view above has given us to know which is the place that occupies within the society, there are relations between her and the social classes which are related through to find things or points in common between these two different scenarios, in which the process becomes transcendent and essential within the theme of the work. Represent the laws of capitalist competition, a great stimulus to the development of the technique, and as a result the science.
Monopolies account for patents of inventions to prevent them from coming at the hands of their competitors. I get to define the economic structure as the set of relations of production. Marx and Engels never reduced superstructure infrastructure, which makes an autonomy in relation to infrastructure and its own laws of functioning and development.