The entire period of consultation, depending on the magnitude of the problem and objectives requires from 2 weeks to 2 months of individual work (1-2 meetings per week). Add to your understanding with Brian Krzanich. For comparison, for example, in the case Drama divorce divide, usually requires at least 6 months, and often about 1-2 years to start neutrally perceive what happened. So what is a resource combining astrology with psychotherapy? In the first stage study, the coordination of the client's request, which sets the motion vector, is a goal that we have achieved in the course of our work. After that prepares interpretation of individual birth horoscope. For this turns out the date, time and place of birth of the client. The first meeting devoted exclusively to personal acquaintance with the interpretation of the horoscope of birth. Horoscope birth gives the information needed to better understand themselves, their typical reactions to situations call. After all, personal horoscope – is the most accurate psychological test, which allows to understand the features and characteristics of personality, to assess the resources and abilities, understand the features, understand the causes of conflicting reactions and understand the basic aspirations.
When getting acquainted with the horoscope of birth, clients are often amazed at how may know so much about the peculiarities of their lives. Many say that something is tormented them for years suddenly became clear, the important intuitive sense clarified and accepted, we recommend that the direction of motion and ultimately found of support. Horoscope Birth – a description of our features and talents, the recommended scope and direction of evolutionary development, for development by people and came to this world.
To the afternoon continuity was given, with the received one at the moment of appreciation of Music, To rain of Magic Fire Twine. After that, it had the explanation and presentation of the graph worked per the morning in pair. As the dynamics of the explanation of the graph was analyzed plus a graph. With this graph it allowed the quarrel on the importance of the use of the calculator. In this analysis, it was possible to evaluate if it was certain, the scale, the ratio, the column, legend lack, in end the parts of the all that composes the graph. For the fulfilment of the activities they had been used bristol boards for the graphs, you clip, penxses and papers. In these activities, the Formadoras had explained as to make the use of half metodolgicos, easy to elaborate and that all can confection as, for example, to use the penxs as unit of measure and others. They had made the use of the twine literature, on sum.
E thus gave the ending of the performance of the Formadoras that tralharam objective. At night, it had the cultural moment, what it favored us to know to integrate them of playful form, making possible us reinforcement of the interpersonal relations, that are so important, to congregate the measures of our being that they need to be balanced with the measures of that they are and they are of our side. Sixth? Fair 16? 07 the -10 morning surprises? in the ones with its indetermination; with its appearance in being or not, it has seen rained another hour the sun it shone, and it was thus the day all. We begin this day with the dynamics of the second fair, that is, the group organized for Cities, where they were the Beautiful Water Cities, Handle and Is Bento of Una. The morning was indecisa for many, therefore many were tired of a distendida night, after the consecrated schedule of the rest.
The social structure is many times in some teoriasapresentada in opposition to the social organization. The social structure corresponds estabilidade of one definitive society capable to characterize it, where aestrutura is subjects to the few circumstantial variations. In this direction, aestrutura tends if to differentiate of conjuncture (COAST, 2005, P. 393). Oliveira (1998, P. 191) appraises structure socialcomo one ‘ ‘ commanded set of chained parts that form one all, is atotalidade of the existing statuses numdeterminado social group or in one sociedade’ ‘ (grifo of the author). The author aindaressalta that the social structure is the static aspect of ‘ ‘ organization social’ ‘.
SegundoCosta (2005, P. 406) ‘ ‘ status is quedefine in one determined social structure, the position that each individual occupies nahierarquia of social papers estabelecidos’ ‘ (grifo of the author). The status comumente is called posiosocial, having been a comparative element enters the members of a society, capazde to determine norms, duties, rights privileges for its members. The social status serves to distinguish osmembros from a social group, sobrepujando situations of dependence, domination esubordinao. Oliveira (1998, P. 203) affirms that she is for the status that the individual is classified and for whose reference its conduta judged.
What to podeobservar itself it is a hierarquizada society. Where leadership functions socially remain in the top the privileged posiesmais corresponding its high prestige socialdesempenhando. According to Coast (2005, P. 407): Some statuses are optional, that is, depend on the agreement or not on the individual in assuming certain posiosocial, as, for example, the occupation of determined public offices. Other statuses are attributed and independem daescolha individual. In a family, for example, to occupy the position of avindepende of the will of who occupies. (grifo of the author) the social paper is configured as a set denormas, rights and duties that involve a person in its performance in umadeterminada institution, this social paper is attributed to it. The organized papers sociaisso of complementary and hierarchic form, and in such a way involve umgrande number of social actors. These forms of papers hierarquizadosencontraram in the social division of the work a form of organization of the work. Oliveira (1998, P. 198) when appraising social paper concludes that ‘ ‘ it is ocomportamento that the social group wait of any person who ocupedeterminado social status, is oaspecto dynamic of status’ ‘ (grifo doautor). When the individual ocupaum relative social status in umdeterminado group, this occupies a social status (OLIVEIRA, 1998, P. 199). On social structure, Coast (2005, P. 393) affirms that the study of the new technologies of information and communication it has levadoalguns authors to extend the structure concept in order to incorporate noode net? set of contracts indirect right-handers and between agents, creators denovas forms of sociability, different of the depoder or blood relations. In summary, the estruturasocial is present in the society and is related to at the outset dynamic concept of estvelcontrapondo of the society. The position, the social paper and the status are concepts similar for queambos are many times established through an effective, other people’s social context to the choices of each one. The fulfilment of the rights and duties of each umindependem of the position, the paper and the statussocial of each individual that composes one definitive society.
Also this supercomputer make to think could me or to feel that I am now writing these lines on the impossibility to be a brain in a Cuba. It is clearly that the problem of the relation mind-world treated in this text is not a problem of easy resolution, because, by the way, she is not this the proposal, however this is the object of primordial study of the philosophy of the mind and to think a brain about a dissociado Cuba of a body is with certainty a theory that creates more difficulties of what the proper one disciplines if considers to decide. Still to this it could add the fact of that it was not only my brain that was in Cuba and yes this was a collective hallucination and that we would really be in a tank, better saying, only the brains without bodies receiving stimulatons from a supercomputer. as if this were of little account thing to take the idea to the extremity to infer that we are not only a brain in a Cuba as all the sencientes beings that our brains know as existing they were fruits also of electric stimulatons produced by the supercomputer. It would be as to affirm that it does not exist beyond what my mind obtains to conceive, in other words, it only has existence what to think me to the supercomputer or to feel that exists. But it remains to ask, as Putnam, if in the case of that this was really truth, that we are a brain in a Cuba, would be possible that now we would be reflecting on the fact of that we are a brain in a Cuba? Putnam approaches its problem for the bias of a relation mind-world and for the fact of the brains in a Cuba to be unprovided of bodies, is clearly that of guarded form it has the idea of the relation mind-body.
' ' We call ' ' ente' ' many things and in diverse directions. Being is everything of that we speak, everything of that we understand, with that we hold in them of this or that way, being is also what and as we ourselves we are. To be is in what it is and as it is, in the reality, in the being simply given (Vorhandenheit), in the text and resource, the value and validity, the presence, ' ' h' ' ' '. (HEIDEGGER. 2004, P.32) In this manner the being is what we give to meanings it, a being it to be is something that if he distinguishes from excessively for the fact of the being understanding and giving meant to the world where if he inserts. The being is dismissed of world for needing significao and sensible that is given to it by the being, it he only exists for the being.
Carrying this idea to what he calls yourself of alienation he is clearly that the alienation is not in the being more receives significao for the being, to have meant is necessary that he understands it to the being in ' ' daily pay-sena' '. ' ' The presence is not only one being who occurs beings among others. In contrast, from the ntico point of view, it if it distinguishes I privilege for it of, in its being, that is, being, to be in game its proper one to be. But also it belongs to this constitution of being of the presence the characteristic of, in its to be, that is, being, to establish a relation of being with its proper one to be. This means, explicit and in some way, that the presence if understands in its being, that is, being. He is proper of this being who its being if opens it and manisfeste with and by means of its proper one being, that is, being.