' ' We call ' ' ente' ' many things and in diverse directions. Being is everything of that we speak, everything of that we understand, with that we hold in them of this or that way, being is also what and as we ourselves we are. To be is in what it is and as it is, in the reality, in the being simply given (Vorhandenheit), in the text and resource, the value and validity, the presence, ' ' h' ' ' '. (HEIDEGGER. 2004, P.32) In this manner the being is what we give to meanings it, a being it to be is something that if he distinguishes from excessively for the fact of the being understanding and giving meant to the world where if he inserts. The being is dismissed of world for needing significao and sensible that is given to it by the being, it he only exists for the being.
Carrying this idea to what he calls yourself of alienation he is clearly that the alienation is not in the being more receives significao for the being, to have meant is necessary that he understands it to the being in ' ' daily pay-sena' '. ' ' The presence is not only one being who occurs beings among others. In contrast, from the ntico point of view, it if it distinguishes I privilege for it of, in its being, that is, being, to be in game its proper one to be. But also it belongs to this constitution of being of the presence the characteristic of, in its to be, that is, being, to establish a relation of being with its proper one to be. This means, explicit and in some way, that the presence if understands in its being, that is, being. He is proper of this being who its being if opens it and manisfeste with and by means of its proper one being, that is, being.